For the better decision to agree or disagree with the statement, I would argue merits of the both choices and would make a decision for this inquiry in the last. This approach always enables me to make a better choice in the long term, and always make a clear decision in the short period of time.
It enables me to release myself from pressure and expectations of others. Without any stress, I can truly maintain my motivation for and concentration on my work. As I can concentrate on my work, I have more chances to succeed in my duties. This success will make me more confident. In addition to gaining confidence, relief from stress allows me to have a fresh mindset. It will encourage me to tackle with other things/another thing or seek more difficult goals.
Format 4: Health
It can provide good exercise for us and improve our health. For instance, I am working for the marine insurance company located in Tokyo. I commence working at 9 am and finish at 11 pm everyday. I can make no time to have exercise, and no exercise may harm my health. Thus, I need more exercise now. Once I have better health condition, then I can expect/anticipate that my productivity and quality of my life will greatly be enhanced.
Format 5: Money
This would let me have (more) extra money, and such money will give me opportunities to enjoy my hobbies. For example, I like taking a trip, and I also like driving a car. Unfortunately, I spend much money for maintenance of my car such as a car tax, insurance and fuel, and therefore no or little money is left to take trips. Saving money is very important to me. The more money I have, the more places I can visit. I would like to visit many places and enjoy sightseeing. Moreover, I would like to communicate with local people and enhance/diversify my knowledge. It will be definitely an exciting experience to me.
Format 6: Environment
If I choose A, I would/could contribute to protecting the earth. Environmental problems, especially global warming, are enthusiastically taken up all over the world . The cause of global warming is carbon dioxide. We may also say decreasing emission of quantity of carbon dioxide is one of the main concerns all over the world. I believe [A] consumes less natural resources and emits less carbon dioxide than choice [B]. That means [A] is a preferable choice for all people in terms of protection the environment.
The proponent of the statement views XXX in a positive light, whereas the opponent in a negative light. To simplify the argument, if xxx is a preferable choice for me, then I will agree to the statement. Now, for the better decision to agree or disagree with the statement, I would argue merits of the both choices and would make a decision for this inquiry in the last. This approach always enables me to make a better choice in the long term, and always make a clear decision in the short period of time.